It is not about being a simp or whatever that means. It is about LLM’s being trained on licensed data and the output being a transformation (literally a collection of functions) of that data. Meaning that it is virtually a certainty that the output without a license notice is a violation on the license of the data it was trained.
Not to mention all the others shit show that AI’s companies do , are trying to accomplish and stand for.
I’m not sure what do you mean by this, one is either complying with the license or not.
The data is not accessible to anyone, you need to have a subscription to one of these services to even access the output of these LLM’s, not the data itself. The data is closed behind AI companies’ doors.
If someone would take all data out there (licensed or not) and really make it accessible to anyone (like what Aaron Schwartz tried to do) I would not be that mad about it. This is certainly not the case though. AI companies are trying to rent access to this transformed data for profit.
AI companies business implementation of LLM’s goes against FLOSS in practice and in spirit.