I agree. They’re upset for many reasons.

It’s obvious that economically they want neoliberals. They would hate FDR as much as any Republican.

Will they say that on CNN, MSNBC, Fox, CBS?

Establishment Dems are upset at progressive Dems for working hard to help the working class.

That man is peak health and virility and I am once again asking him to run the country.

I’d rather he be the Speaker of the house, the majority senate leader and the president at the same time.

Jeffries is called AIPAC Shakur because he’s a corporate and AIPAC sellout and because he’s always doing goofy middle school level raps in his speeches.

I don’t know what to tell you but being so sensitive over something so innocuous is silly.

https://youtube.com/shorts/ZLXje0iBkKc?is=qcdR6hMvFomUuAxa

He likes rapping platitudes but always forgets to include his AIPAC handlers in his rhymes.

You do go through so much effort to be offended.

You’re really trying hard to twist something that isn’t meant to be a racial insult into one.

Jeffries likes to rap in public events so the AIPAC Shakur is more directly making fun of his sold out nature plus making fun of how bad of a rapper he is. As in, he’s a fake Tupac.

I expect a few new Fettermans will unveil themselves in February.

Every centrist will fight for that tradition. Also, they will fight to keep the filibuster with the same excuse.

So only the definition that you prefer is valid. Not the actual meaning of the word.

Who gets to decide what words mean?

Do you also get bent out of shape when someone says Uncle Tom? Is that not insulting to historical Toms? This is your argument.

Maybe wait for the family to tell people that they are offended instead of you pretending to be offended for them.

• Virtue signaling – Expressing outrage to demonstrate one’s moral superiority or social awareness.

• Vicarious offense-taking – Taking offense on behalf of someone else, particularly when that person isn’t offended.

• Manufactured outrage – Deliberately pretending to be offended to create controversy.

I looked it up.

Shakur means thankful in Arabic according to the internet.

AIPAC Shakur is a perfectly fitting name for Jeffries. It shows that he’s thankful and politically motivated by AIPAC because he has been bribed.

Also, it’s weird to claim that a single family owns a word and therefore everyone using that word is insulting someone.

I suggest you look up virtue signaling, vicarious offense-taking, and white knighting.

AIPAC Shakur never fails to show us who owns him. Capitalists and Israel.

Haley Stevens is engaged to her foreign handler.

I imagine that Schumer and Jeffries are upset because it puts the spotlight on them for being publicly disloyal to Democrats that are not owned by AIPAC.

Haley Stevens is too dumb and gave away the game just like the Democratic ghoul James Carville did.

https://www.foxnews.com/video/6407096189112

I don’t see any way this is a politically coherent move for her.

The writing is on the wall. AIPAC is forever toxic for anyone with even a tiny amount of critical thinking skills. That only leaves the GOP and Zionist owned cable news shows as viable paid options.

Seems like a lot of people in power or seeking power are there to make sure Israel continues to get American taxpayer money, endless weapons, legal immunity and the willingness to go to send American troops to die for Israel.

Haley Steves prefers genocide over a leftist podcaster.

I want a working society. That requires taxes.

Only a brain dead libertarian would be against taxes just because they are are taxes.

lol bill me for something I don’t even want.