• grue@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    The takeaway here is not “fuck fire trucks” (nor is it “wtf those crazy !fuckcars people are anti-fire-truck now?!”). The takeaway is that fire trucks often don’t have to be as large as they are.

    Why should fire departments get a veto over the urban planners when designing the streets, but the urban planners not get a say when the fire department is choosing which trucks to buy?

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      I watched the first minute, and it seems the problem is partially that fire departments can dictate standards that make them comfortable instead of what is actually necessary.

      • grue@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        IMO a lot of it is because:

        1. fire department procurement seems unrelated enough that most urbanists aren’t paying attention to it,
        2. fire departments choose the biggest trucks they can because of course they do, and
        3. once the trucks are already bought, insisting the roads accommodate them is a fait accompli.
        • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Yes, but even given that, the fire department is asking for some pretty outrageous accomodations in their clearances on straights. The first example gave them 3 inches of clearance on either side, but they wanted something close to 2 feet (forget the details).

          I think another problem is that people expect cars to just always park wherever the fuck they want regardless of the law, which is a separate problem.

    • the_q@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 days ago

      If you’ve ever had the “pleasure” of working with emergency services you’ll know that the people attracted to that kind of work have a type…

  • Melonpoly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Not just bikes did a video in this, showing how stupidly big and dangerous American fire trucks are.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 days ago

    Another way to look at it:

    It’s a political competition between protecting property and protecting people likely to be renting.

    • grue@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      That is a really fucking weird spin on it, in multiple ways.

      First of all, you think renters don’t use sidewalks or bike lanes?

      Second, you think wide, highway-like streets are good for property owners?

      Third, you don’t think single-family houses can be rented or that housing units in high-rises (requiring large ladder trucks to access) can be owned?

      I, for one, see no particular reason why owners’ and renters’ interests wouldn’t be aligned on this issue.