return2ozma@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agoEat the rich alreadylemmy.worldimagemessage-square147linkfedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down115cross-posted to: latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageEat the rich alreadylemmy.worldreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square147linkfedilinkcross-posted to: latestagecapitalism@lemmy.world
minus-squarethinkingofyouihaveananxietydisorder@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·2 days agoits very hard to tax a completely dispossesses living post human object created as a monument to pain and experiment in suffering. also taxes require a state. those tend to go bad places.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days ago Taxes require a state Since when? There’s ways to do taxes without a state
minus-squarethinkingofyouihaveananxietydisorder@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 hours agostill would rather not have them than tax them. not having them would be easier than taxing them. starting in on not having them would make taxing them as a conditional surrender much easier if that were your ultimate goal.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 hours agoPlanning for idealism is the enemy, first we must tax them, then we must destroy them
minus-squarethinkingofyouihaveananxietydisorder@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agois this like some weird Marxist thing? because killing them seems way easier, and like it would make taxing them easier even if you only got a few.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoNot a Marxism thing, just a realist thing, perfect is the enemy of good So you need to make steps forwards rather than trying to do one giant leap
minus-squareLodespawn@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoI mean, you’re not wrong I guess
minus-squarelauha@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoWhile their possessions are hard to tax, they themselves are still fragile meat sacks.
minus-squarethinkingofyouihaveananxietydisorder@quokk.aulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agokill them, or make them wish you had! who says the only solution is killing?
Why not both?
its very hard to tax a completely dispossesses living post human object created as a monument to pain and experiment in suffering.
also taxes require a state. those tend to go bad places.
Since when?
There’s ways to do taxes without a state
still would rather not have them than tax them. not having them would be easier than taxing them. starting in on not having them would make taxing them as a conditional surrender much easier if that were your ultimate goal.
Planning for idealism is the enemy, first we must tax them, then we must destroy them
is this like some weird Marxist thing? because killing them seems way easier, and like it would make taxing them easier even if you only got a few.
Not a Marxism thing, just a realist thing, perfect is the enemy of good
So you need to make steps forwards rather than trying to do one giant leap
I mean, you’re not wrong I guess
While their possessions are hard to tax, they themselves are still fragile meat sacks.
kill them, or make them wish you had!
who says the only solution is killing?
I didn’t propose it.