• schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m not screaming about an em-dash. Look at the first comment they make on their posts and come back and tell me what you think.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      come back and tell me what you think.

      I also dislike this sort of condescending tone on forums. I’m guilty of it too, but it never makes me want to engage.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m not being condescending at all and your comment makes perfect sense in isolation. It’s stupid to call out a single construction (or punctuation mark) as you’re interpreting me as having done. I’m just assuming you’re smart enough to see a pattern when you see it repeated often enough; so sorry, I guess?

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I wasn’t involved here, got curious, did look and… Yeah it’s odd. An awful lot of commonality.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        So is there in my history.

        Same with some replies in my inbox. I see a lot of semicolons, “not X but Y” formats, OpenAI purple prose, stuff I might suspect as slop in specific contexts, but I’m not pointing fingers over it unless it seems like they are actually trying to spam something. There’s no way I can tell if an LLM was used with reasonable certainty.

        Perhaps I’m unreasonably agitated by this. But I don’t like the idea of a “purity test” for writing style; the Tech Bros that are forcing that paranoia on us don’t deserve one ounce of our attention.