Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

00:50 Sponsor: Internxt

02:24 Kernel devs agree to remove Al disclosure, Torvalds goes off on A.I.

04:54 Kernel 7.3 released

06:24 Big influx of Rust code in Kernel 7.4

07:40 Bitwarden moves to a commercial license, mostly

10:06 KeePassXC supports auto-type on Wayland now

11:12 Mint shows more of their new apps

13:01 LibreOffice is getting record download numbers

14:49 Proposed Al assistant prototype for Ubuntu

17:43 OpenBSD gets Wine and runs Windows games

19:13 Cutefish desktop revived as a vibe coded MacOS Clone

21:06 Epic Game Stores new preview looks pretty bad

22:55 Big Tech funds study to warn against digital sovereignty

25:18 Massive PHP flaw discovered, and patched

27:47 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computers

Links

Kernel devs agree to remove Al disclosure, Torvalds goes off on Α.Ι.

https://www.xda-developers.com/linus-calls-banning-ai-generated-code-utterly-stupid-as-linux-submissions-no-longer-need-Ilm-disclosure/

Kernel 7.3 released

https://itsfoss.com/news/linux-kernel-7-3-release/

Big influx of Rust code in Kernel 7.4

https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-7.4-Rust

Bitwarden moves to a commercial license, mostly

https://community.bitwarden.com/t/published-version-update-in-app-stores/102750

KeePassXC supports auto-type on Wayland now

https://keepassxc.org/blog/2026-10-21-2.8.0-released/

Mint shows more of their new apps

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2026/10/linux-mint-new-system-monitor

LibreOffice is getting record download numbers

https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/10/21/8-weeks-9-4-million-downloads/

https://linuxiac.com/libreoffice-hits-9-4-million-downloads-in-just-eight-weeks/

Proposed Al assistant prototype for Ubuntu

https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2026/10/ubuntu-ai-launcher-prototype

OpenBSD gets Wine and runs Windows games

https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=179236125692175

https://linuxiac.com/wine-on-openbsd-yes-and-it-can-already-run-the-witcher-3/

Cutefish desktop revived as a vibe coded MacOS Clone

https://itsfoss.com/news/cutefishos-vibe-coded-desktop/

Epic Game Stores new preview looks pretty bad

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/10/21/epic-rolls-out-vibe-coded-launcher-update-its-absolute-trash/

https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2026/10/epic-games-launcher-preview-is-slowly-becoming-actually-usable-on-linux/

Big Tech funds study to warn against digital sovereignty

https://itsfoss.com/news/eu-cloud-sovereignty-cada-cost-study/

Massive PHP flaw discovered, and patched

https://www.wiz.io/blog/php2shell-php-rce

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cw98z6qlyvg30

  • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I reference some AGPL projects (without actually copying code) to write my own project, is that frowned upon in the FOSS community? My guess is no.

    So to me the difference between the two sides, is about fair use. One side thinks AI training isn’t inherently violating copyright licenses, and the other side thinks it is. FWIW, I believe the US courts side with former.

    • klankin@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah it is, thats why you’ll hear ‘cleanroom development’ tossed around, to refer to someone that has never seen the other software’s source is developing its replacement.

      This matters legally because its an airtight way to prove no copyright could have been violated. Usually the community overlooks such minor violations to support new developers, but unfortunately this sentiment is changing fast thanks to the modern piracy landscape.

      The term ‘cleanroom’ has gotten pretty muddied with AI taking it over to mean ‘mathematically exclusively derived from the original source, but cleanroom makes us claim legal overship over someone else’s work so that’s what it is’. You can see how the meaning has drifted quite a lot once it reached marketing.

      I haven’t seen any precedent in US or other courts on the originality of AI code, but if you have any links I’d be interested in learning more. It would be quite a monumental ruling, because it requires us to ask - how small of an AI model is technically original?

      If I train an ‘AI’ on a single pice of work, can I then claim ownership over it legally? Or does it specifically require whatever the current state of the art datacenters are at? Cause then its just legal for cooperation’s to ignore copyright and no one else.