Well, it’s not a matter of just knowing some arbitrarily chosen Asian languages… it’s a matter of knowing:

• The languages of the original texts
• The languages spoken by the majority of scholars
• The languages spoken by the majority of actual practitioners.

Imagine a Christianity scholar who couldn’t tell you the difference between ἀγάπη, ἔρως, or φιλία. That would be pathetic. Imagine an Islam scholar who doesn’t understand the difference between Salah and Dhikr. That’s also pathetic.

I don’t think a scholar necessarily needs complete mastery over these languages… but they should be proficient enough to get information from the source material when they have questions.

No, I’m not laughing at the strategy. I’m laughing at the idea that the democrats will implement the strategy correctly.

But hey, crazier things have happened.

if democrats play the manipulation game right.

lol.

Liberals getting completely bent out of shape if you don’t use the right words or terms to refer to them

I dub thee: Little removed removed removed, Lady of removed snowflake removed.

And if you don’t like it, that’s your fault for having a personal identify that doesn’t align with how I perceive you.

I’m still confused. I thought the Snack situation was,

1. You’re hungry,

2. The chips are ready to eat,

3. You eat the chips.

So if there are no chips, you have to make something to eat instead, which becomes de facto Dinner. So the No Snack situation is

1. You’re hungry,

2a. There is no food ready to eat,

2b. You make food to eat,

3. You eat the food.

I might be off base here, but I don’t snack, and I actually don’t understand.

I understand that I’m not the target audience of this meme, but I’m confused. Isn’t it an option to simply eat dinner?

Alternatively… to simply be hungry for an hour or three?

Ah Cannae put ma weigh’ on tha roof, Ah cannae put me weigh’ on that gutter; Where’s it meant ta go???