Here you go:
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/11/08/technology/nvidia-investigation-jensen-huang-china.html
In short: she’s the head of a weird company that works “totally outside of China” while having business relationships with multiple Chinese companies, and having been created as an offshoot a Chinese company directly connected to the CCP.
She is suspected of being a Chinese spy. As in: an agent of foreign state sent to honeypot Huang and steal secrets.
Keep in mind that the GPU is a heavily regulated market with China being sanctioned - no exports of modern GPUs to China are legal.
(notice how nervously dismissing Jensen always is when asked about the black market GeForce cards already in China)
They forgot to add “make no mistakes” at the end of the prompt, noobs.
How does that fix the issue OP is writing about? The knowledge no longer accessible from a simple web search?
Anyone who wants to get into anything even remotely BDSM-y should have mandatory reading of Sunstone first.
There’s a character there who lost her hands because she wanted to impress her dom boyfriend and tied herself to the bed with self-tightening knots. The boyfriend - not aware of the fact - was home late. By that time she lost strength in her arms, the knots tightened and cut off blood-flow and her hands had to be amputated.
This shit is sexy and hot, but dangerous if performed by unaware/inexperienced people.
I’m sorry, you’re not making any sense to me. Maybe a language barrier?
What side? Are you saying that they’ve been secretly supporting right-wing agenda through over a decade of supporting left-right-a-centre projects, as long as they’ve aligned with their very specific agenda? And, after all that time, they accidentally tripped and got outed by supporting a random dude in France?
Mate, what are you on about?
Proton support cases, not political sides. Yes, in the bit you quoted, they bashed Dems and praised Reps for… supporting their case. How does that go against anything I said about them?
Is that supposed to counter my arguments somehow?
This was after Trump 1.0 and before the insurrection. So it’s more like: “Imagine praising private Hitler in the trenches for his amazing art and then being surprised by negative reactions 30 years later”.
albeit a little less after the Trump-endorsing antitrust tweet by Yen a few years ago
I still don’t understand what was wrong with that.
He called a very specific, very pro anti-trust decision (made for all the wrong reasons, but that’s besides the point), a good thing.
People started calling him a Nazi.
I just don’t get it…
If Google ever becomes certain that their monopoly state is in no danger of being broken by legislature, they stop financing Firefox, and Mozilla immediately dies to bankruptcy.
I think your example serves the other guy’s point…