

I totally understand the frustration. But when it’s a choice between losing access to health care vs. getting locked up or worse, please don’t throw away your vote.


I totally understand the frustration. But when it’s a choice between losing access to health care vs. getting locked up or worse, please don’t throw away your vote.


Soon we’ll be calling them the ‘five and ten’, which is what they used to be called. Except back then they were talking about cents.


Only if they take the majority … VOTE!


Because it comes out of one-time capital and reduces ongoing liability. Stupid, I know, but the accountants say it good.


Unfortunately, the collapse of the U.S. affects other countries around the world. And I can comment on whatever the fuck I want to comment on. Yes the rule of law in the U.S. is a farce. But that doesn’t mean a civil society shouldn’t have laws. Specifically immigration regulation is often required to manage resources and prevent overloading.
Yeah I agree with your math (well I haven’t checked it but it sounds about what I’d expect). But 7% isn’t a big amount within the other approximations going on here. The point is that it doesn’t double using helium even though the density is double because the relevant change is the difference between air and the other gas - which as you say is only 7%. Like if you could somehow make a weightless container that had a perfect vacuum in it, you’d only gain another 7%.
Hardly matters as the salient amount is the weight of the displaced air, not the weight of the helium or hydrogen. However using hydrogen might lead to a nice flameout.


You might think that, but I’m not even in your shitty country.


There is no utopia, and using a gun certainly won’t go in that direction. A functioning democracy is the best chance we’ve got. Yeah, it’s gone off the rails now, but blowing up the train won’t help. And it’s better to have a conductor trying to steer the thing in a better direction than a worse one.


The rule of law is the rule of law. You can mean what you want, but by default it means what it is. Without laws (which we are dangerously close to with the ruling elite now), we have no society. You can want higher immigration, and accommodation for people already integrated - and that’s great, but I suspect you still want the law to regulate immigration somehow.


No. Thats the how. And as I said, it matters. Can’t you read? No offense.


It’s because his usage of ‘fake’ doesn’t mean what one might think. He simply means a headline that he doesn’t like.


Much better to have somewhat regulated capitalism than the fuck up we have now.


Well supporting immigration limits and rule of law is kinda a good thing, no? ‘How’ matters a lot here.


How do you use ai to record audio? I mean, recording audio is just procedural code. You can use ai to process the recording, of course.


Prolly not. When the bubble pops these data centers will be sold off for cents on the dollar and a bunch of the companies go bankrupt. There will be a glut of equipment, so prices will fall. People will buy up the scraps and provide compute services cheaper.
Taking action sooner would have had no effect. How is it morally better to report it such that it has no affect? They are trying to swing enough seats so they can actually have some real effect.