You can’t have a certain category of crime for which all accusations are be taken at face value and truthful by default.
Point of order - that is not what is being advocated for here.
No one said “Let’s ruin people’s lives based on taking an accusation without any proof”
They said “Consequences for rapists” and somehow that jumped to “there’s no way to prove rape happened” like it is a crime that leaves behind no physical evidence or corroborated accounts of repeat patterns from multiple often unrelated victims who have no knowledge of each other.



So much of the arguments around trans women in sports put forward paint sports as an issue of winning. They do not put sports forward as a civil human right to be able to participate in society. There are so many comparative opportunities made for disabled people to participate in sport that use those arguments but here is a group that faces barriers of social ostracization and they are basically told that they aren’t worthy of being tolerated. That they must accept a dramatically smaller access to society.
What is the purpose of sport? Does it have just one purpose and does that override every other good and enriching thing it offers?