Yes, and now consider even if those technology secrets exist… How likely Huang is able to explain it in 5 minutes of pillow talk that would actually be detailed and technical enough to be useful for Chineese engineers?
The only alternative I imagine is if she wasn’t spying on technology secrets directly, but was involved in smuggling AI chips operation, and used Huang to get those chips to China for reverse engineering.
I have also thought about that. Jon Ossof seems like the most likely primaries and general election winner. But AOC is also polling strong, second place in democrat primaries. The democratic party is almost split 50/50 between moderate and progressive wing, so it would make sense to have some sort of compromise ballot, where better polling moderate is the president, second best polling AOC is the VP, so both wings of the dems get something out of it.
That kind of applies to most beliefs. People aren’t rational, we are motivated reasoning machines. The key is to get to understand emotions causing people to believe wild stuff. People are far less combative when you are curious and empathetic about personal experiences that led them to their opinions, not fact-checking them. This way you can have a normal conversation with basically anyone on the political spectrum.
No. Shifting blame from the corporation onto the consumer is bad, actually.
Is it confirmed she has BPD?