Yes because release price=price people actually buy it at. Also show me a 5060 at $300. The release price used to be the price early adopters had to pay as a premium. Now it’s a discounted price that you can never actually get.

Why am I arguing with you. You’re seriously claiming Graphic card prices didn’t increase. That should have been enough to make me block you and ignore your nonsense.

That price range was for the XX60 and on a good sale the XX70. The fact that $300 gets you an XX50 is a tragedy.

It makes the potato have more calories because it has oil in it.

Same amount of chewing and swallowing. More calories. It’s what you want!

By the fact that I have a death note… This is a hypothetical scenario where the person who answers has a death note. That’s the system. Did you read the thread? You said you wouldn’t use the death note on billionaires and “non acute” threats because we already have systems to deal with it? But there is no actual system because billionaires don’t get imprisoned or punished for their crimes including raping kids at Epstein’s. Sounds really unethical for you not to. I guess you’re one of the “I would never pull the lever” people in the trolley problem.

That doesn’t address the fact that there are no functioning mechanisms to implement justice against those who harm us by hoarding pillaging and staking from us to amass incomprehensibly vast wealth.

We do not. The billionaires pillage and kill with impunity. Cops and ice kill and pillage with impunity. You’re living in a fantasy if you think our system deals with the other cases. Look at the Epstein list.

Have them list their inheritors. Have them say their wealth is cursed and anyone who keeps even a cent will die.

Then write the names of everyone on the list for the next round unless they give up all their wealth.

What kind of mathematically illiterate nonsense is that. You think to be in the global 1% takes MORE MONEY than being in the US 1%???

You understand that requires the global average wealth to be HIGHER than the US right?

Besides the top 1% of the 1% (billionaire class) are a lot more problematic than someone who makes 450k/yr… That’s just a good doctor in the west. Plus Forbes publishes a billionaire list.

Take away the concept of limited liability. Shareholders are responsible for the crimes the company they own commits.

This will create an insurance industry to protect shareholders and they would force companies to demonstrate compliance with regulations to keep premiums low.

If someone in the company committed fraud to deceive the owners then they can try to sue him. He can go to jail too if it’s criminal.

Making it so owners are not responsible for the actions of the company that makes them money is why the system is broken.

Limited liability corporations were initially created for large public projects like bridges where the liability was too high to attract investors, but the public benefit was very large. Where is the public benefit now?