He’s victim of fake ads that impersonate him. Does he intend to sue Facebook and the ads creators? He has the means to hire a lawyer.
Facebook and Mark Z have no shame, and users don’t care enough to leave, so speaking up is not enough to make Facebook behave.
Claude gets a development credit, so we guess you could say e486-web was (partially) vibe-coded.
It looks like a fork that lacks credit, generated with Claude.
Is the “No advertisement” rule relevant here?
This is basically advertisement for a casino and/or ponzi scheme.
Thanks. This post just look like a slop image with a headline. Might as well delete it, repost the link without the slop.
Never slop
Producing more papperclips is essential. Nothing else matter. /s
Oppose large AI datacenters projects near you. Get informed and organized.
The certificate authority and their auditor will need to answer questions from browsers.
They both should have detected and reported this.
I looked at the first couple links you pointed me to. This is hardly cherry picking.
The author themselves write their review include low quality study, acknowledging it weakens the conclusions. It’s the author’s assessment, not mine.
Should I ignore the 2 first links, and look a another, specific one?
I looked at the first couple links given the time I have.
These article conclude there seems to be an effect while stressing the conclusions are based on low quality studies.
From Paulo Alexandre Pereira et al 2026:
acupuncture is a safe and effective alternative to medication, despite the low to moderate methodological quality of the included studies
From Chuwen Feng et al 2025:
methodological weaknesses are worth mentioning, such as diversity between studies and the inclusion of lower-quality clinical trials. Future research should consider the importance of conducting large-scale, multicenter randomized controlled trials with standardized methodology to confirm these findings
The science based medecine article I linked earlier references (reviews of) good quality trials & with strict controls, such as E. Ernst et al 2011:
numerous systematic reviews have generated little truly convincing evidence that acupuncture is effective in reducing pain. Serious adverse effects continue to be reported
There are good reasons to remain skeptical, given reseach that include low quality trials see some effect, while others don’t.
My inderstanding is that good quality trials of acupuncture did NOT find any therapeutic effect. https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/acupuncture-doesnt-work/
Is this new study showing an actual therapeutic effect? Or is this a description of cellular activity as a possible mecanism, but without evidence of a therapeutic effect?
Edit: found the original publication mentioned in the news article. High numerical aperture confocal volumetric mesoscope reveals mesoscale subcellular dynamics in vivo.
This claims an anti-inflammatory effect on mice spleen. Hopefully we’ll hear soon what the medical research community think about this trial.
Add the websites to existing malware blocklists, ideally ones that are loaded by default by uBlock Origin, and browsers with integrated blocklists.
This would protect visitors, and make the problem harder to ignore for webmasters since lots of visitor would get a big read scary screen. This is a radical option, but fixing this mess would take such a radical action.
It is also devastating for visitors when their savings gets stolen by malware distributed by infected websites.
Notify webmasters and give 1 week to fix the issue. If webmasters fails to fix the issue or are unreachable, adding them to blocklist seems appropriate.