PieFed.social, but I’ve occasionally seen some lemmy.world ones as well.
For example, just try searching for: “starcitizen steamdeck guide”
And third result currently goes to PieFed (a PieFed.social account posting to a Lemmy.world community).
I see Lemmy/Piefed results through DuckDuckGo.
OP is on dbzer0, but they posted to a Lemmy.world community.
That sounds like a good entry for the Consumer Rights Wiki. What companies are doing this? I couldn’t find any on a quick search, but “prompt injection” is probably skewing the results down the wrong path here.
Be careful of just dismissing a ToS simply because some parts of it aren’t legally binding. A lot of it is binding and if you think otherwise, you’ll need to convince a judge of why that is. That’s going to require time and money that could have been saved by using another service with a more reasonable contract.
Looking at your example of arbitration clauses, while those may not work in some countries, in the US that’s a different story. You can have an attorney argue that this term should not be binding, but there are varying factors that a judge will look at to determine this. Was there an option to opt out? How easy was it to opt out? How much time were you given to opt out? Etc.
Arbitration clauses can be useful for courts since they offload work to external parties. So, there is a little extra work on your part to convince the judge that they should rule out that term. In most cases your best bet will be to have the judge allow you to use an unbiased arbitrator rather than the one that’s usually specified in the ToS. Even then, you’ll still need to convince a judge of that.
For example, “browsewrap” in which “using this service constitutes agreement to our TOS” in which the service never actually shows you the TOS, is almost completely non-binding.
That’s likely why there are so many ToS that put these in your face and have you click a button before you can continue with anything else. So, browsing a website probably wouldn’t be binding, but creating an account and using their service probably would be.
Piefed has some LLM detection tools for moderators as well as bot detection for admins.
It’s also worth pointing out that some users on here use translation tools which may trigger some of these “AI Detectors”.
Yes, there’s a checkbox when you create/edit a community on Lemmy or Piefed to make it so that only moderators can post to a community. I’m not sure about Kbin/Mbin communities.
Edit: If you want to reach more users (Mastodon users), I would suggest a PieFed community since you can have every post set to have an automatic hashtag applied. Lemmy users won’t see the hashtag, so it shouldn’t bother them.
Maybe The Shannara Chronicles?
Instead being set in the far future of an apocalypse leading to robot animals, it’s more of an apocalypse set in the far future leading to Lord of The Rings:
I’m not sure if there are any with that specific ruleset. You’re probably better off putting in a new community request with an instance somewhere.
Yeah, I didn’t realize it for a while as well. The multiplayer has its own whole storyline of what happened before GLaDOS took control.
In Portal 2 there’s a multiplayer mode. It can definitely be used as a weapon when you quickly swap out the portal exit so that your companion falls to their demise.
There are some fun community levels where you can race against a friend and there are all sorts of traps you can trigger/set if you plan it right.
The Point of View Gun, conveniently, does precisely what it’s name suggests. That is, if you point it at someone and pull the trigger, they instantly see things from your point of view.
The description in the article sounded a bit crazy… So I had to lookup a video of it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7p5LxFdc-Qg
Woah, I feel like you skipped out on some big details there. What happened? Or is there a post with some more details?