Agreed, just because something isn’t necessarily being actively argued about but lies within the subtext of the argument, doesn’t mean that one is being held to a different standard or being argued as a better system over the other. The fact of the matter is that if someone is arguing that gulags are bad, as an example, then they probably think the modern prison system is also bad. The heart of the argument is that forced labor institutionalization is bad and it shouldn’t take much introspection to understand that, but when someone enters the argument with whataboutism it’s now seen as bad faith because they don’t appear to understand the argument, just who’s making it and what side it’s currently criticizing.

Ah yes because the gop is the correct choice and are blameless here in this particular vote…

Yeah that one works.

Link 404

How tasty?

Comments coming from unsubstantiated and random people should be treated with more than a grain of salt. Believing in fear mongering at the behest of the mob is hardly thinking for yourself.

As always, the T-Rex also gets fed, an indestructible shelter, and a hunting knife.