Bootlick some more. Nobody is grateful and nor should anyone ever be “grateful” to a corporation.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Ah yes, another “leftist” who takes time to shit on the USSR for no reason and who believes the US and Russia are somehow in the same ballpark as imperialists.

Saying that Russia “may not have the influence [of] the US” and then judging both states exactly the same is wild.

Critical support for Russia. America will fall.

So is the .ml admin staff just completely and utterly dominated by AI bros? Sheesh.

feddit user posting nothing of substance as communists own the discussion

Shocking

It’s hilarious you think that by voting for a genocider you’re supporting Palestinian childen. You know, the children that Democrats and Republicans have both been relentless in their support of bombing. Brilliant.

There is nothing transphobic about criticizing capitalism and everything transphobic about ignoring it. Socialists defeated fascists in WW2.

The only thing you got even remotely accurate is that I don’t support Ukraine.

The American experiment’s continuation depends on you voting.

Awesome, I didn’t know we had this kind of power! So who do I vote for to make the America experiment cease to continue? Which candidates are criticizing the oppressive systems of Capitalism our society is built around?

Oh, none? Nobody? Not a soul? So you meant if we want to continue doing unlimited genocides and unfettered imperialism in the global south, we have to vote. Got it. My bad. I’ll never vote again. Thanks for the lesson.

Stardew Valley is an indie game with a publisher. It is not about publishing.

It must be so easy to be a capitalist. Every communist success never happened, and those that did weren’t communist.

Like a box of rocks.

You just wrote an entire paragraph attributing arguments to me that I’ve never made. And you have the nuts to question my intelligence for accurately observing material reality.

“996” “Xinjiang” “workers don’t share interests” yeah buddy you’re a sinophobic moron. I deal with people like you virtually every day of the week. The reason I don’t engage with the stuff you say is because you’re parroting lines from people like Adrian Zenz without having a clue who he is or why that matters. You’re not interesting enough for me to coach.

Socialism is a mode of production characterized by a working class dictatorship, workers owning the means of production, and the government having a principle interest in public ownership.

At no point does socialism not have bourgeoisie. They just do not control government and get executed for their social murder schemes. Youre conflating communism, a mode of production without classes, with socialism, a mode of production that empowers workers.

You would benefit from studying historical materialism. You wouldn’t say such silly things if you had the education.

China has billionaires and private equity under state capitalism, a perfectly normal component of any state transitioning out of capitalism. The bourgeoisie in China have no political sway, are subject to so many regulations it would make your head spin, and actually pay taxes. If a billionaire in China betrays rhe working class they get executed.

To say that China has the “fastest growing population of billionaires” but to not recognize what being a billionaire means under socialist states with working-class parties running their government is to be dishonest intentionally. Saying China isn’t socialist because of billionaires is a very silly stance.

As for terrible working conditions, you just made that up. Because you’re weak. China is a nation of 1.5 billion people with strong workers rights. Your sinophobia doesn’t matter when we are looking at the material, historical record of the economics of China.

China, since the revolution, has been lifting up the proletariat of various nations and investing in infrastructure and technologies. There is no debt trapping, those stories have been thoroughly debunked by world economists for decades now.

The United States, on the other hand, has been using economic warfare since inception.

Removed by mod

The only place worse than .world is piefed. Both are completely full of ignorant liberals. Piefed is just extra cringe.

Tibet was liberated from a feudal mode of production that used slavery. Liberation is not imperialism. You can say China is repressing whomever you want with no evidence, and I can handwave such absurd claims with no evidence.

You know you’re in trouble when even Wikipedia is telling you there is no genocide in Xinjiang and that Tibet was full of slavers and feudalists.

Ahistorical drivel. China is not imperialist, and if you can’t see that, I ask that you study Lenin’s titular book on the topic. There is no pretzels twisting, I can happily debunk whatever claim you make about China being imperialist with ease.

The state is not an enemy, only idealists think this way. The state, when governed by the proletariat, is good.

I almost strictly post to .world. I guess you have to make shit up all the time to hang.

Nobody said it was, you’re attempting to handwave an important piece of evidence because it is inconvenient for your narrative.

The idea that China hasn’t dropped a bomb in fifty years supports that they’re not imperialist. But the biggest evidence is that they’re, you know, a socialist state. Socialist states do not have the budget nor interest in imperialism.

Feudal Tibet was liberated from its slavery. Xianjing was recovered after western color revolution attempts. Taiwan is allowed to exist and China has zero interest in taking it, given it’s already a part of China.

There is no imperialism coming out of China since the revolution. Western liberals coping with their own violence by being sinophobic never ceases to amaze me.