I hate this so much, happened like 5 times already to me

Well he shouldn’t own a national security thread. We all have our flaws I guess.

It doesn’t. I wouldn’t say I made a generalization but a very high level explanation so it’s easier to understand for non-tech people.

I suspect modern models are trained specifically on these kinds of questions to spare the embarrassment of this question for future models.

that does mean they stochastically understand the occurrence of other numbers for this question and if you wrote tokens similar to this it would answer with 4 or whatever the specific case. I’m just trying to explain that no matter whether it gets it right or wrong, it goes off of statistics and semantics, not math. Because these things are not made to do math, that’s what algorithms are for, and we know very well how to write them.

Kind of but not really. AIs learn to predict text but they can’t really do math the traditional way. They learn the tokens, which are more than syllables and less than a word long. So because they don’t do math, LLMs in particular speculate “something like 3 comes after this question” because in training it has seen similar questions answered with “3”. That’s the jist of it.

Brother why is this poll account bound?

Makes sense, China has the best open source base models so that’s what I expect most countries to build upon.

Let me answer what happens currently:

When a person is dead, trust & wills happens. Either someone is explicitly given ownership of the estate (often it is split between children) but if not, the estate forms it’s own legal entity that operates to the best understanding of the decedents wishes.

With the accounts it’s a bit more complicated but generally from what I know a lot of platforms offer to reassign an account if a death certificate is provided and a family member has come forward to request control. However in practice I would assume this only happens to the accounts that family members are aware of, and the rest of them basically become stale.

With regards to privacy, I would assume it is preserved for the most part. If relevant details about the decedent come up for legal reasons there might be some good cause to breach these but I can’t imagine all person information gets revealed just because. Though I’m also not a lawyer, so take all of this with a grain of salt.

Tbf that’s not a hug, and that doesn’t solve the issue of wanting a hug.

1070ti and some hexacore something cpu that’s alright with around 24gb ddr4, I think one of the slower speeds. I also got a faster PC with another llama.cpp instance and I vibe coded a quick and dirty proxy which I can use to switch between the different backends. It’s genuinely useful because I got code editors but also my Open-WebUI using it.

Sounds elaborate but generally it’s all pretty primitive.

Also fyi long preloading steps because my vram is obv not good enough to hold the full model and kv cache and stuff, generation at about 15t/s tops.

My experience is right now we’re at the stage where it’s a good assistant but not great for actually taking over bigger tasks completely.

Am looking forward to:

• experimenting with existing non-uniform quants; I believe those quants are the next step to more bang for your buck on those low-grade consumer rigs
• hoping for new kinds of quants to come out and be more widely adopted
• maybe a more universal or consistent harness that is less prone to broken tool-calls etc.
• better models, specifically a new version for 35b a3b.

• Qwen3.6 35b a3b Q4_K_M running on llama.cpp
• Open-WebUI as a frontend
• integrations with an embedding model and searxng & crawl4ai
• doing lots of different stuff with it, asking basic stupid questions, recipes, tech stuff, etc