Translation: “Americans, please let actual fascism win and endanger every minority group in the country if the Democrat isn’t perfect.”

No one likes Newsom and I think his chances of being the nominee in 2028 are fading, but if he is I will vote for him.

Let’s not. I’d like you to tell me what I got wrong. I described the output of LLMs as “a bunch of pablum [which means ‘trite, insipid, or simplistic writing or speech’] that sounds convincing and sycophantic[.]”

So do you want studies that show they product pablum, studies that show their output sounds plausible and convincing even when it’s wrong, or studies that show they’re trained for sycophancy?

If he waits a few more days after that, hopefully Netanyahu won’t be free.

What I posted was correct.

Because I’m capable of reading chat logs and research posted by humans. I follow this stuff closely, because I’m a software developer and it impacts my career. I don’t have to use LLMs to understand how they work and what they do.

Now if only British Columbia hadn’t put the conservatives in power there.

I’m considering moving much of my 401K to the emerging markets equity fund. Not much exposure to AI there.

I’m… not? I don’t touch the stuff.

You’re right, it responds with a bunch of pablum that sounds convincing and sycophantic, too.

Boom Bubble. It’s not a boom, it’s an economic bubble, propped up with circular financing instigated by NVIDIA.