• 0 Posts
  • 68 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2026

help-circle
  • If it’s weighted then it’s not completely random, nothing about the system you described is “completely” random.

    I was more talking about your attitude about ADHD/ASD when referring to your lack of empathy. Lacking empathy will make you more of a social problem than having a chronic illness, IMO.

    Personally, I have some of the chronic illnesses you’re talking about. I love being alive and my life adds lots of important things back into my community. You sound very depressed and I’m sorry. But it’s not appropriate to take it out on others by being a big ol’ fascist on the Internet.

    There are too many of us. The more of us there are, the less all of us are worth.

    I disagree. All human life has value and it appears that our population growth will slow before we reach earth’s carrying capacity anyway.

    People are going to do this anyway.

    Some of you fascists already are, like the people advocating eugenics in this thread even though we all know what happened in WWII. You say “people are going to do this anyway,” I say, we defeated fascism once, and we’ll do it again.


  • kestrel7_7@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•No need to reproduce 💜
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I obviously don’t advocate for child neglect, but I also don’t think eugenics will solve child neglect. What you’re describing is poverty, and it isn’t helped by eugenics.

    I also don’t think the earth is currently overpopulated, and it seems that our population growth will slow before the planet does become overpopulated (my personal estimate is that we can have about 15 billion people). So I don’t think we have any need for population control whatsoever.

    How are you gonna stop people from reproducing without oppressing them? Literally what methods don’t involve creepy authoritarianism and body horror?

    When you complain about overpopulation but not overconsumption (the actual problem, which most people can’t even afford to engage in), it sounds like you just hate poor people.


  • It should be a completely random lotery for a lucky 5 million people.

    And then you go on to describe a situation which is anything but random

    Should also be people with higher empathy

    This comes off as extremely ironic given the general lack of empathy you’re showing

    After that, there should be an emphasis on food consumption (people who need less food on average get a higher weight in the lottery).

    what about this is “completely random”