So much disdain, and yet so little argument. Did I say we should mute and not argue with intolerant people ? No, I was precise, and you did not :

If we would tolerate intolerant people, we would expose segregate people to even more segregation

“Freedom of speech”, “intolerant”, “rationality”, … you are repeating terms that mean nothing without concrete situation. Segregated people are muted by their oppressor; so long for the freedom of speech, and the rationality. If people wants to speak to nazis and de-radicalized them, good luck to them. The point was to not make others have to be around those nazi because a WASP want to de-radicalized them; doing so will just make a community more nazi, and less queer or racialized.

Ideas are not disembodied, their are link to people; without a social diversity, their is no diversity of opinion. Again, the post was about communities.

Ecologically ? Yes; with phalcon you could use low level execution

No it’s not. Becoming tolerant to intolerance is intolerance and cowardly. It’s called Paradox of tolerance

If we would tolerate intolerant people, we would expose segregate people to even more segregation. However, ban their communities and using their code is not the same thing. If pirating video game make by shitty person is okay, why not looting FOSS production ?

PHP is the best web language, not because it’s a good language, but because the other are worst