• 1 Post
  • 12 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 27th, 2025

help-circle






  • That very well may be so, but even still I would argue that the primaries are really the time to hash out policy and candidate positions.

    I’m not from Iowa, luckily, but Turek beat his main primary opponent by more than 25%, which suggests he is more tapped into Iowa political leanings than the average online commentator. I’m from Oregon, so I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that whoever Iowa elects is going to be much more “moderate” than the people who represent me and my state.

    Regardless, the choice right now (and it very much is a binary one) is whether Iowa wants to send a Democrat, Turek, or a Republican, Hinton, to the Senate. Come January, it’ll either be Turek or Hinton–a de facto binary outcome. And that singular choice may mean the difference between a slim Democratic majority or a slim Republican one.

    What will a Democratic Senate mean for the next two years? It’s hard to be sure, since Trump can be more than a little bit unpredictable. But at the very least it means Democratic control of Senate committees, which will go a long way towards holding the Trump admin at least a little bit accountable for their words and actions. Speaking personally, I would always rather have the Democrats in power than the Republicans, easily.

    So again, people should vote with their hearts, without a doubt, but they should also understand the strategies at play and vote with their brains, too.

    To be honest, whether it’s FPTP elections or the power dynamics in Washington DC, it is a little bit exhausting to have to explain this stuff every 2 years… But people should be informed about how the system works and vote accordingly.


  • No election is a binary choice

    This is, as a matter of political science, incorrect.

    Currently, almost every election in the United States ultimately boils down to a binary choice, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duverger’s_law

    You can certainly disagree with the candidates, the platforms and the messaging all you want, but the truth is that (in almost every first-past-the-post, winner-takes-all election in the United States) one of two people (usually a Democrat or a Republican) will ultimately win–and to the winner go all of the spoils. That’s the system we currently have, and as someone who agrees that it sucks, I highly recommend advocating for state and local reforms to make elections laws more democratic.

    What does candidate A represent? How does it compare to candidate B? Fundamentally, the question absolutely boils down to “which one of these two people do I want to win, and which one of the two do I want to lose?” And that is the basic question by which the informed and politically-aware voter ultimately ought to make a strategic decision. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_voting

    Vote with your heart AND with your brain.





  • mrmaplebar@fedia.iotoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world•Burn out on Lemmy?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I really can’t blame people for getting burned out–hardware costs are expensive as fuck right now, software exploits are more urgent than ever, the entire Internet is endless sea of bots, and there is no mechanism in place to offset any of the associated costs or work to the community. As things are right now, a small minority of fediverse users are shouldering all of the burden of various costs so that the rest of us can use this infrastructure for free.

    From a money and time standpoint, it seems mostly unsustainable, and it’s not something that can go on forever or scale up and up.

    I think there are ways to make it more sustainable, like quotas, subscriptions and ads… But they are pretty unpopular.

    Unlike corporate social media, we can’t rely on leveraging other people’s money in the form of VC or stocks, and so we are left mainly with voluntary donations.

    But in the end, the health of the fediverse is arguably in the breadth and diversity of its servers. While it’s good to have some newbie friendly flagship servers, it’s probably better if everybody isn’t concentrated on the same few mega servers.

    And it’s a shame when a server goes down because the person running it burns out or can’t afford it. But this usually ends up being a social problem moreso than a technical one. And social problems can be mitigated (or avoided) by improving communicating and making sure that we aren’t putting all of the load on any one person. There are cultural changes that we can make to improve the health of specific communities and instances.