

The point of unit tests isn’t that the tests are important, it’s that using them makes you write your code in testable units.


The point of unit tests isn’t that the tests are important, it’s that using them makes you write your code in testable units.


I’m more-or-less agreed with what I think you probably mean, but you’re going to have to be more specific than that. What does “should” mean, is it morally wrong or just likely to lead to bad results? What does AI mean, does it include anything with a neutral net? Or even the formal logic systems which were popular in the middle of the last century?


If they want to watch something with slightly better quality for ten times the cost plus included spyware it is indeed up to them lol yes.


You don’t need the world’s best display to watch your prestige tv slop. Projectors are a pretty good viewing experience with some minimal setup.


the same sucky life is even worse with heart disease, not that I don’t sympathise with the desire to get out but that’s a really dumb way to do it
All capitalism is unchecked capitalism eventually, since the capitalists will always have an advantage in propaganda and be able to buy the government, even if it’s just a little at a time at first.


Uh oh, I pretty much always do this. Especially for new-to-me projects. The less confident I am about how the whole thing works, the more I write tests for my change. Should I stop pushing them so people don’t think I’m Claude?
This is good. I’ll be in charge of the independent evaluation panel.