People do it because they think being able to use code at work without dealing with legal issues more important than protecting the software from exploitation.

It’s kinda classic American capitalist freedom thinking.

American: Freedom = no regulations Others: Freedom has to be protected by regulations

Jensen Huang is a cowardly piece of garbage.

Tell him how much of his own RAM is currently unused.

…but then he probably knows how much is sitting in warehousing.

I’m only aware of one foreign nation that appears in those organisation names.

No “Friends of Montenegro” that I’m aware of.

“Flip flop”?

Oh she just “flip flopped”, did she?

I think she betrayed the people who supported her.

So go for others. It’s a target rich environment.

Once you start sending the message of there being consequences, the ranks will break and you’ll get you 67 senate votes.

Your first sentence is basically impossible. When reviewing code, your insight is always inferior to the person who wrote it. Often my code reviews consist of questioning the programmer on why they’ve done what they have, because I need their perspective as well.

You can’t do that with an LLM because it doesn’t really know why it did things.

And testing properly…? Nobody does that. LLM or human.

He’s majority share holder.

Democrats need to clean house almost as much as republicans do, but clearing AIPAC out isn’t going to be easy.

No, because its done with no regard to those caught in the war. It’s just exploitation.

…because allegations don’t get it done.

We need him bang-to-rights. No wiggle room. Conclusive evidence. He’s the most powerful man in the world and he shrugs off allegations.

He also didn’t use the levers of power he had effectively. He was playing gentleman’s rules whilst the real threat to the country (from within) waited for him to get out of the way.

The Supreme Court nominations is the obvious one, but he should have been reinforcing all the checks and balances in the system, possibly even relinquishing powers away from the Office of the President where they have accumulated over 250 years.

Bin Laden wasn’t the threat. His own position was.

War profiteering then.

Not that either.

Think a couple of levels deeper.

We already know that establishment democrats are fiscally captured. That’s the whole point of the DSA candidates. This isn’t news. So why now? Obviously, the midterms.

California isn’t in play next week, but lots of other places are. So a story running now doesn’t really harm establishment Californian Democrats. They’re safe. It harms other democratic candidates (probably more socialist leaning candidates) in other knife-edge states by party association.

What does somebody, who’d like these progressive democrats to lose, do a couple of days before national elections? They call up a journalist who is already pro-wealth-taxes and feed them a (true) story about Californian Democrats fighting against wealth-taxes. Story goes viral and a few blue voters stay home because “the Democrats are corrupt”. Republicans edge a seat or two that they’d otherwise had lost.

That’s what they hope, at least.

Who fed the story to the journalist? Don’t know. Could be pro-Trimp factions. Could be a Republican campaign. Could be establishment members of the Democrats that would rather see the midterms lost than lose control within the party.

Regardless, it’s all voter manipulation and needs to be ignored until after the election.

The company hasn’t lost anything. The investors in the company lost money.

That’s not a bubble bursting. It’s not nearly enough fallout. These are the warning signs.

None of those need to be humanoid or dogoid.

Simple truth: if you own a house, you would want house prices to go up, forever.

Hardly. I need a house. If my house price crashes to $5, I’ll be able to get a much nicer one for $10. Just $5 extra investment.

The problem comes when you’ve borrowed against the house at the higher price. Negative equity is no joke, but I don’t care what my house is worth otherwise. It’s value is completely unavailable to me.

Sure, but there was still a bubble and it burst.