OH MY GOD, I forgot that one. Another solid example of what could be

My apologies. I just meant to emphasize that “squander” would suggest they wanted to do the right thing, and didn’t…

I’ll choose my words more clearly next time.

Same side. I meant that as in they didn’t do what the people wanted… They did what THEY wanted

Got dam, no wonder people don’t like usb-c

The what?

HERO

I don’t have the time currently, but if someone has this as text… I’m sure no one would complain about it being posted here in the comments

Yes, I know. Next time I’ll be more specific.

They don’t have the votes to pass ANYTHING. So it’s either try to impeach/convict, so that they can maybe pass things (and remove him from further shenanigans).

I think removing him from committing further actions is paramount personally.

Other path, hope we can get a supermajority for literally everything else.

I hope one day “Lambasted” is the new word. It won’t be true regardless, but it’s a step in the right direction

I personally think this is EXACTLY what they want. They put this out so people like you and me would feel despair.

What matters is that you use this as fuel to push harder for separation from foreign influence.

Citizens United was such a bad ruling. It has allowed legal bribery for far too long.

Doing it today… And tomorrow… And the next day… AND THE NEXT DAY.

Hard disagree. They didn’t squander anything. They did what they wanted to do.

We are more informed now, we can organize better now.

Neo-libs are getting primaried more and more. At least some of them KNOW that they can’t fuck up again, or they’re gone.

You might not want to hear this, but it’s going to be a slog… Because we still don’t have a super majority.

In the left direction ;)

Just shows how disconnected these people are. He doesn’t give a shit about the real impacts of the war, he only cares that Republicans are losing total control of the government.

So attempt to get MULTIPLE supermajorities to enact laws… Or get 1 supermajority to impeach/convict.

We don’t know, what we don’t know. Either of us could be correct, but I don’t think anyone really knows what’s going to happen.

Edit: it seemed like you didn’t understand me, because you specified conviction, not trying to be combative, just wanted to be on the same page

I mean I agree that neo-lib and corpo dems definitely weren’t the appeal but, you vote for a person. That’s how it works hahaha.

Just wanted to highlight that not everyone was voted in on hatred alone.

I honestly believe that the hatred aspect mostly drove people that wouldn’t normally vote at all, to finally vote.

You misunderstand me. I mean to fully impeach.

What do you think they’ll be able to pass without a veto? Can’t veto impeachment.

Bad take. Impeaching Trump reduces the amount of time he’s in charge/has the authority to direct people. Committing more and more illegal acts…

They MIGHT be able to get some Rs on board to do it too.

That’s not necessarily true. Talarico beat Paxton by 20pts

While I do feel that some candidates were exactly that, I wouldn’t ignore that some candidates have genuine merit.