You really don’t have any clue what you’re talking about, do you? You were the one that brought up the Duma, I referenced actual scholars, including firmly anti-communist scholars like Kotkin. Truth doesn’t matter to you in the slightest, just using historic tragedy to bat for billionaires and a predatory system of capitalism. You aren’t even trying to convince anyone, so why bother?
I already admitted to all genocides committed by capitalists, so I don’t know how I’m defending them. You really see this a sports team thing, right?
BTW lol @ “scholars”
My evidence never contradicted me, you didn’t even know what you were saying for the majority of this conversation and got your talking points mixed up.
You really don’t have any clue what you’re talking about, do you? You were the one that brought up the Duma, I referenced actual scholars, including firmly anti-communist scholars like Kotkin. Truth doesn’t matter to you in the slightest, just using historic tragedy to bat for billionaires and a predatory system of capitalism. You aren’t even trying to convince anyone, so why bother?
I already admitted to all genocides committed by capitalists, so I don’t know how I’m defending them. You really see this a sports team thing, right? BTW lol @ “scholars”
They did not, in fact, contradict me.
Nah, I clearly gave you half a dozen sources.
Yes you did. And they contradicted you. Maybe comprehension?
You’re confused if you think Wikipedia is a source. I gave half a dozen sources, none of them Wikipedia.
It must have been the holy ghost…
Yep, and your claims go against it.
I just quoted it, hard to be against it.
Evidently you don’t, because you keep inventing falsehoods.
It’s your source man…
I’ve read both, you’re wrong.
Weird, I just agree with your sources!
Please elaborate, everything I have linked backs me up.
So, you haven’t read either you sources or my comments pointing it out?
You’re confused, the scientific consensus aligns with what I said
Except your own source contradicts that. Splendid work.
I’ve always understood that you have nothing to go off of.
Except the scientific consensus. Minor detail.
I’ve already understood it, you haven’t so far though.
I’m glad you finally got it. Progress.
You have to read 100%, not the 1% that agrees with your political beliefs.
Excalty! You got it finally.
I’ve read it, you’re wrong.
You have to read 100%, not the 1% that agrees with your political beliefs.
My evidence never contradicted me, you didn’t even know what you were saying for the majority of this conversation and got your talking points mixed up.
Read it again. Make sure you sit down, tho!
You haven’t posted any evidence, you just rejected what even liberal historians acknowledge.
No, I haven’t. I didn’t need to, since your evidence contradicted you. Thanks, I guess?