• paks@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’ve been the car driver who nearly made jam out of the cyclist in the last panel. I’ve also been the cyclist hit by a car which was driving in the cycle lane.

    Bad road users are everywhere and they use all sorts of transportation. Let’s stop with the division and generalisation.

        • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          rules aren’t neutral or grown out of the void. people with biases and maybe even ambitions create them for specific purposes

          EDIT: To quote Anatole France: “The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal their bread.”

          • FishFace@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Rules governing bike traffic are generally quite reasonable though. It’s not like the enlightened traffic planners in the Netherlands went “you know what, cyclists don’t have to obey red lights” for example. So I’m not seeing the biases you’re talking about, at least in this example.

            Comparing running red lights to sleeping under bridges or steal for survival seems, at best, hyperbolic. In any case I don’t think that quote supports the view that the law is intentionally biased

            • MonkRome@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The lights often automatically changes to cyclists priority in many places in the Netherlands, and often provide underpasses to avoid conflict points in the first place. It is not a comparable situation. Traffic laws and infrastructure in the USA, for instance, are incredibly biased in favor of cars, so their comment is absolutely relevant.

              When I bike in the USA often the safest time for me to cross an intersection is unrelated to whether I have a green light, but more related to if anyone else at the intersection does. The safest time for me to go is when no one else at the light has a green light, not when I do.

  • amniotic druid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    My biggest gripe with cyclists is that they act like a car when it’s convenient and a pedestrian when it’s convenient

  • hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This thread is doing a great job of explaining why tribalism around forms of transportation is not constructive.

  • limelight79@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Ah yes because every driver obeys every law all the time. It’s only the cyclists that break laws! No driver would ever consider speeding, rolling through a stop sign, or being aggressive!

    Won’t someone think of the poor drivers!!

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Your point is well taken, but whataboutism aside, EVERYONE should be obeying ALL the traffic laws. I cycle on public roads myself and I do see other cyclists not stopping at red lights. A bicycle IS a vehicle - it doesn’t come with pedestrian rights.

      Or we can just keep escalating finger pointing and law-breaking until the traffic laws are meaningless everyone is dead.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Fair but think about hitting and killing a cyclist who had run a stop sign or light. That doesn’t just go away. The person has to live with the trauma of killing another person potentially at no fault of their own.