Five industry professionals tell the FT it is commonplace for risk modellers to be asked to change analysis in order to artificially lower prices
I also note that this includes stuff like states suing independent risk estimators
Five industry professionals tell the FT it is commonplace for risk modellers to be asked to change analysis in order to artificially lower prices
I also note that this includes stuff like states suing independent risk estimators
A naive person (like me) might think that an insurance company would be setting itself up for a fall by doing this, one day finding that it had to pay claims it had not collected enough fees to cover.
But that’s because I’m not thinking like a capitalist. Who bears the risk that results from this kind of fraud? Not the insurers who commit the fraud and profit from the insurance, but the insured, the ones who paid for insurance:
This is making the opposite point. Capitalism should stop this, banks and homeowners should be the ones suing over this instead of the states.
These fraudulent risk assessments should theoretically be putting massive investments at huge risk, but no one cares because in the end they know they’ll get bailed out by the insurer of last resort (the state).