• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Copyrights won’t help you here. It’s not the same code or assets

    • Chaf@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      How will copyright not help here? You don’t have to use the same code or assets for something to be copyright infringement. It’s one thing if you personally don’t believe in copyright, but just claiming that it has nothing to do with copyright because it’s not a 1:1 copy is just not true.

      If you made something that “just happens to look like that other thing”, you’ll have a hard time defending that in court (especially if you extort them beforehand). Heck, there have been copyright lawsuits over musicians using similar lyrics or melodies since forever.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        That copyright protection is only against using recognisable characters, samples etc and has a high evidentiary requirement. It doesn’t apply to art styles, prose, game mechanics and so on.

        • Chaf@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Fair, I’m not saying it would be easy to prove in general (if you have an extortion letter, however, it should be fairly easy), but that’s what courts are for. Also this is not about copying a style or game mechanic, but the whole game. Then again, copyright law differs quite a bit between countries, so overall it depends, but saying this does not involve copyright is just not true.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            It’s a very muddy area. Game clones have existed ever since video games existed and using copyrights to fight this is imho going to cause a lot more problems than it solves. Sure, go after the extortionists, but stretching copyright law to do it, is going to fuck us all over.

    • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Training data is based on copyrighted material that is stolen. Someone should be made to pay somewhere. The theft of human thought cannot be allowed to be exploited.

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Copyright violations aren’t stealing. Human thought cannot be “stolen”, only shared.

        • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Human thought shared between humans cannot be stolen. A billionaire’s company feeding a machine all human thought for purposes of replacing said human is absolutely theft.

          As for copyright, tell that to all the people fined for piracy.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Copyright violation is punishable by law, yes. But it’s it’s not theft.

            A billionaire’s company feeding a machine all human thought for purposes of replacing said human is absolutely theft.

            It’s immoral sure, but not theft. We don’t need to equivocate to pass moral judgement.