• artifex@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Revoke launch licenses until NASA gets what they need. Export ban on company and tech. Nationalize launch assets if absolutely necessary. Or at least threaten these things. SpaceX needs starlink, the kind of AI revenue they’d otherwise need is never going to materialize. Force them to play ball.

    • raman_klogius@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      All of these are rational national plans, if only the administration is rational and working on national interests.

    • tquid@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If it was built with public money, it should be appropriated to public use.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        They generally weren’t given money.

        They won contracts and provided services. They did it almost entirely with fixed base price contracts as well. None of the cost plus, which was typical in space, and leans more into handouts as people intentionally try to milk the government by going over.

        Its like if the US government buys billions of pieces of paper a year from paper suppliers and you expect them to own the paper companies that sell them the paper because they took government money for a sale. Many even own their own mills, but thats now a government mill since the government bought their paper.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          This analogy falls apart in several ways. The majority of all funding for SpaceX comes from the government. This isn’t like a paper company that has massive contracts outside of the government. Furthermore a paper company is a dime a dozen and probably not a national security issue like the sole provider of needed launches.

          Governments would probably never need to take over a mundane company like a paper producer, but they most certainly would need to take over a critical supplier of national security needed services because it is run by a space Nazi.

          • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Doesn’t really matter if the government is the main source that gets it off the ground.

            Maybe a upstart paper company was able to snag a contract and they could undercut existing companies because they found an abandoned mill that they got for pennies on the dollar.

            National security is definitely an issue, but again nothing to do with how it was built. Thats entirely outside how something is funded.

            Edit: just to clarify the majority of all early funding. Today its starlink, government money isnt the main thing now.

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Musk also desperately needs that starlink revenue to continue until he can merge Tesla and SpaceX to cover for dropping Tesla sales.

    • Kokesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      And who will make these restrictions? Until someone shoots trump, that’s not going to happen. Hopefully it happens soon.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Yeah that’ll happen. I’ll just stay standing while holding my breath until it does.