For example: private equity firms buying trailer parks and raising rents so high that people go bankrupt

  • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    The fine for financial crimes needs to be in addition to whatever profit was made from the crime. If the punishment for a crime that gained $100 million is a $20 million fine, that’s not a punishment that’s just the cost of doing business.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      The fine for financial crimes needs to be in addition to whatever profit was made from the crime.

      The problem - the greater, potentially insurmountable problem - is… corruption and dishonesty.

      If you use a term like “profit”, then they’ll find another way to move money around and categorize it as something else that doesn’t qualify. Many huge companies already pay little to no taxes this way. If they can find ways to lower their tax burden, they can find ways around most things. It will not always happen, but given time I’m sure someone will innovate faster than law can keep up.

      The end result will ultimately be auditors or auditing… which if not purely independent can be corrupted. This can come from the company, if they are hiring auditors or self reporting, by whatever authority is in charge of auditing, or by the powers that be starving the auditors of resources which is exactly what has happened to the IRS and US tax system.