This one was never $35. The higher compute power and 16GB onboard RAM had the base price at $120 at launch.

This isn’t inflation, it’s billionaire-flation.

That’s the dumbest thing I’ve heard today. Having Claude “play”-test a game 1200 times isn’t the same as having 1200 humans playtest something. It’s having one pseudorandom test 1200 times.

Also, isn’t the point of games that humans play them? That’s why it’s called a playtest. Humans play the game and report what they found enjoyable versus what needed work. The designer then gets to choose if adding units or balancing abilities is warranted. How would a machine know what an audience finds fun? How could it know what a dominant strategy might be? They don’t, and this idea that you can outsource creativity to AI is fundamentally flawed.

I wonder if Republicans will finally (and coincidentally) discover that he’s “died.”

Taking time to celebrate is not a rejection of the work to come. Throwing cold water on everyone not even 24h after winning is like a boss reminding their employee to be on time the next day, at the employee’s birthday party.

You can celebrate. You can take a sigh of relief. And also, there is more work to come after that.

ETA: taking time to celebrate is a ritual practice that galvanizes the moment and marks these important moments in our psyches. Refusing to do so is missing out on a wonderful and powerful biological mechanism humans possess.

And they’re actually funny, instead of me going, “Wait, is this insane and outlandish thing real, or…ah, phew. It’s The Onion.”

It’s not really satire. It’s snarky but poignant, though I think there’s something to be said about letting people celebrate.

It’s the day after the election. It’s okay to breathe a sigh of relief. The new Congress isn’t even sworn in, yet. We can worry about the next stage of work once we have the right people to work with.

They mean specific ones.

Shares of CoreWeave were lower Wednesday, along with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which is headquartered in Texas.

The first sentence in the article says everything (else) is up overall.

Well yeah, this is a warning for investors. The rest of us are less than nobodies to them.

More like “subscribe in” so they can slowly but continually raise prices, continue to price out the consumer market, and ultimately decide who gets access.

Said something mean about oligarchs? Tried to sue one of their buddies? Promoted pro-worker ideals on social media? No computing for you, or maybe they hit just you with additional punitive hidden fees.

Blocking ad blockers is small potatoes for them. They’re going for the jugular.

90 minutes less

Found their Github. Looks like it’s a custom Linux kernel…? I dunno, it’s really hard to tell directly; I’m inferring from context clues (like tagging Raspberry Pi, mentioning the open Nvidia kernel modules, etc.).

https://github.com/getumbrel/umbrel

Neat!

So to be clear, these are all papers before the peer review process?

I agree, and I don’t even particularly like the foundational use of AI here. Education should be accessible to all, and it would be cool to see this become a free tool for which OP doesn’t even need AI anymore, because there’s enough contributors and experts.

This software isn’t free. It has a cost. Did you think using the tools provided by billionaires was a gift from them?

Also, it’s hilarious that you think I’m bullying OP. Where in my original comment did I say, “No, don’t use this”? I intentionally skipped over my ethical concerns, because OP is likely going to use it anyway.

They’re providing educational content. You can’t just replace the knowledge of experts creating and checking lesson material with AI and hope for the best; that’s how you end up teaching people wrong information.

Y’all pro-AI goobers are so lost in the sauce, you can’t even take a critique.

$13/mo can be a lot for people, that’s true. There’s certainly a subset where they simply don’t have that extra. I suspect that subset is fewer than people might imagine, but I honestly would rather people have accessible education than not.

For the second part, I think it’s a hard ask for experts to contribute in that way, but hey, people spend their hobby time working on Linux and other OSS, so who knows?

I also have ethical issues with the use of Claude itself (as well as other tools/platforms provided by billionaires), but I think that’s beyond the scope of your original questions.

There are other ML models made from scratch by universities and experts which aren’t beholden to shareholders (and might not be accessible by the public, yet), so if you are determined to continue using AI in this way, keep an eye out for potentially better alternatives.

Get a refund

There’s petabytes of data there dude

The fact that you think that AI has a database of information from which it pulls demonstrates that you have no idea how it works. And you think we’re the blind ones lmao

Ah, right. Because I secretly love it and use it all the time, as evidenced by your very scientific source, “Trust me, bro.” What a tired and boring Reddit cliché.

It’s weird that people are so positive towards AI, even when it’s used to generate something with no understanding of the material. It’s now become a disease to be accepting of anything AI, even if it uses the very thing our oppressors want us to use.