

What’s there not to understand? The link shows that there are people thinking about how to break up Russia and if you look at American foreign politics it’s clear that countries cannot rely on the US not attacking them.


What’s there not to understand? The link shows that there are people thinking about how to break up Russia and if you look at American foreign politics it’s clear that countries cannot rely on the US not attacking them.


I would say it’s not for AI but they are taking another shot at remote gaming and will challenge Sony. Those 130 facilities will allow them to have very small latency.


So use them and come up with a good argument if you can only insult me when you are on your own.


sending over 150 billion dollars a year Russia’s way for those resources.
That’s just market value and not a form of support. It’s more an argument for why the West has a motive to take over Russia than it is an argument against it.
Do you put as much foreign policy weight into Medvedev’s recent threats
That’s apples to oranges. One is the overall strategy and the other is the last option. Without the Western threat there would be no need for nukes. It all starts with US resource wars. The rest is consequences.
You are eating up Putin’s anti west “The west are trying to steal Russia’s resources, … propaganda
Calling it propaganda doesn’t make it wrong. Is the West not stealing resources globally? Why would Russia be spared?
The only one avoiding peace is Putin who invaded Ukraine remember?
Which would put Russia at the receiving end of a hybrid war until it is dissolved.


A National Security Advisor wrote this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grand_Chessboard
But it is not so important what they write but what they do. The US wage illegal wars and military operations and do regime changes for resources, like Iraq, Venezuela, Argentina. Russia is an inevitable target with its resources.
Putin has offered cooperation until 2001 and beyond, but the West has stalled. Why would anybody do that and avoid world peace if not for hostile reasons?


So why would Putin sign it if he knows that the US will keep pushing to break up Russia?
It’s called "2 Girls 1 Cup ".


I think most of us were pretty disappointed that Obama didn’t do more
The president is the head of the executive branch, not of the legislation. It’s not his job to change the law. That’s already the first layer of deception.


The healthy vegetable among social networks, waiting for more vegetarians.
So how to let go of self hate?


It could also mean that 9 till 5 people don’t like change and people who are willing to go the extra mile are willing to explore AI.
That sounded like they were supporting Russia, not just doing business.
As did Germany and the EU from using the gas which allows them to finance the war for Ukraine. Usually the processing companies make the bigger profits.
Who is highly decorated. There are the notes from chancellor Kohl that at least Germany had no intention of including Russia despite telling Russia something else. If the West wouldn’t think like that dude we would have behaved differently.
For the most part Russia works for the elected governments, unlike the West. In which country are they stealing?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceX_Starshield
We are starting to continue where the disarmament interrupted the arms race.
Neither will they forget the opium wars and the eight nation alliance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-Nation_Alliance
As long as the US is not willing to let China become the hegemon once they have the better technology, Russia and China will be best friends.
If you look at how poor and sick people live in the US, isn’t becoming part of the US empire the bigger threat?