• joeschmoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk man, I’ve always looked way younger than my age when shaved, but not that extreme. Skin care or not, I would not want to look like that at 34.

  • Zozano@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s Pierce Brosnan, famous for his role as Mister Doubtfire and the voice of Genie in Aladdin

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think also one of them probably had an easier path:

      Sean Connery’s father was Joseph Connery, a factory worker and lorry driver.

      Thomas Brodie-Sangster was the actor and performer, Mark Sangster.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But, you can only tell that because one used sunscreen, and one didn’t. Otherwise they’d look exactly identical. /s

      • musubibreakfast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        What if James Bond did a pdrn mask every time he was supposed to drink and smoke and every time he was supposed have a villain try to torture him he got HIFU instead?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Some people used to be born old. That’s just how the world worked. Also, stupid fashion. Have you seen a photo of a woman college student in the 80s? They look 40.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    The difference is 1 part genetics, 1 part skin care routines, 1 part sun protection habits, 7 parts a lifetime with or without smoking and being surrounded by people smoking at nearly all times.

    • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I wonder if it is also differing beauty standards. Older men used to be considered more sexy. Nowadays a guy over 40 is basically a corpse but if you watch old movies you’ll see guys who look 50 or even 60 in hero roles, and they get the girl, too.

      So what I’m saying is, Sean Connery might never be chosen as a leading actor today because he looks too old.

    • Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m so deeply offended by this post not meeting my exacting criteria for what a shit post is. How could OP not have consulted me? Me! The arbiter of all that is true and good on the Internet. Shame on your house, OP! You will be Blood Eagled by a team of dachshund ninjas for this transgression!

      • Godric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No need to get offended about it bud, they just posted to the wrong comm is all!

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    These pictures are due to two things; genetics and lighting. Even though dude on right looks younger generally, if he was photographed in the same light as Connery they would look much closer in age.

    • Hildegard (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      You can see the shadow on the wall behind him. There is a light below his eyeline. That’s called a beauty light, and it hides wrinkles by lighting the areas that would be in shadow from lights above.

      But smoking also has a lot to do with it.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The one on the right is also married to Elon Musk’s twice divorce ex-wife. As in the wife married Elon, divorced him, married Elon again, divorced him, then marred the guy on the right.

  • Ariselas@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sean is always cool, but I wonder how Thomas would look had he been smoking a pack a day for 20 years too.

    • Eq0@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Is this really it? I thought the non smoking would be compensated by the increased pollution of everything

        • Eq0@literature.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          Thanks for the informative response. I’m a bit confused by the graphs given, that track emissions and not air quality itself. Would you know why?

          • EnsignRoApologist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            AQI is highly variable by locale and hour. It averages out in the end, but measuring regional and global emissions is a better way to compare disparate time periods, except for areas at the extremes.

              • Hoimo@ani.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                To begin, it does accumulate in the region where it is created, but of course it diffuses over time, so 10 pollution could be 7 locally and 3 globally. The heavy elements (soot) never get very far and naturally fall out of the air. Some elements are broken down by sunlight. Some bind to rain and are washed into the ground. If pollution is constant, you reach an equilibrium in the air quality. Decreasing output slowly lowers that equilibrium and improves the air quality in the end.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        There’s significantly less air and water pollution now than the past, with the only exception being microplastics. We haven’t found many short-term impacts from that yet, though

  • iuseasahibtw@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Thomas is like a genetically engineered femboy for Hollywood billionaires.

    No need to go out and molest nubile young boys in the Caribbean, this bad boy is of legal age and doesn’t look a day past 15.

    Like a human version of a toy dog, but with a genetically superior bussy.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Here his is in dr no a year later looking more like he’s 40 instead of 55, given he’s in makup, but the crows-feet smile lines aren’t doing him any favors.

    and here he is 7 years later in 71 (41 years old) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Connery#/media/File:Sean_Connery_as_James_Bond_(1971).jpg

    TBH, the effect on skin from smoking seem to hit like a truck in the 40’s, that’s gotta be severe tanning, smoking and some really rough genetics.

    • Colalextrast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      He would have been early 30s in Dr No, it was released two years before Goldfinch. Still, though, it’s crazy how much the lifestyles of previous generations differ from current lifestyles and how you can literally read it on people’s faces.