Of course, it’s not easy, but so is marriage.

i have a theory that actually bisexuality is the default for mammals and heterosexual relationships a common general preference. I get its confusing for some but what depends is how they personaly perceive their own attractions.

If they weren’t sure and over many years they started to question their own sexuality its a different story but thats not this one.

What changed in a honeymoons worth of time to go from “not questioning their sexuality” to “perceiving themselves as bisexual”

Let me put it this way, if my partner felt uncomfortable telling me something they struggle with. Than i would perceive that as a personal failure. Because trusting eachother to tackle life together is the whole point of the ceremony.

The fact itself shouldn’t.

Not being open about yourself till just after marriage is what’s bothering.

Granted marriage culture has changed alot but surely the idea is still to unite with someone for hopefully the rest of their life.

If one has reservations and arent comfortable to be open about things that is valid but then work on that before devoting yourself to another.

If its a dealbreaker then it feels like a red flag. Do you want to spend your life with a person that doesnt accept you fully as you are?

Youre also supposed to kinds have figured out yourself by the time of marriage. Ofc people can be stuck in the closet for years but just after the honeymoon?

I guess its possible but what events even aspired to suddenly be so sure?

Slightly related i have a theory that all mammals are biosexual by nature with a common hetero preference on top. Its well studied in animals, there are also infinite tales of life with gender separation (monks, soldiers, prison). For many hetero, its not gay if there are no women available.

Sexuality seems like a thing to have discussed before you arrange a marriage.

Its different if someone has not realized or accepted their queerness and comes out years later. But right after the honeymoon feels nasty. Its the kind of move a manipulator uses, omit telling information that could cause others to make different choices then those that align.

I’d wonder what other secrets there are.

I knew someone who claimed to get migraines from being near devices but way less if their is a cactus right next to the device.

Scientifacly its a myth and makes no sense but i knew them good enough that they really suffered from migraines and really believed the cacti helped.

Anecdotally i heard of a family that had to move because one of their kids developed head aches after a new cell tower was put up.

I know, its was a subte joke and bonus plug for their merch store ;)

What a nice little comic, shame you forgot about community rule #4

https://analognowhere.com/

There is also a redbubble 😉

Why do you think they want ai and robots so badly?

A recurring question that rich doomsday preppers have is how do i keep my staff from turning on me?

They are trying to make us obsolote.

The only possible valid reason one should ever feint respect for this cunt is if you are an important (foreign) official yourself and have no other choice then to work with the white house.

Didnt they remove it years ago?

I wouldnt know since i use invidious and automatically download videos of creators i follow using a yt-dlp script.

Til about this specific absolute WTF

Thanks for the information.

I swear this exact story from this exact victim has been out for years. Down to the refusing to wear a condom and trowing money to “get a fucking abortion”

Obviously we should continue to repeat it but what changed since then? Why is the news only reporting on it now?

This is not a bomshell but a gaping crator of a bombshell that fell years ago.

Proof that you know one that does?

Apparently you’re right that MV3 only restricts extensions, not native blockers. I stand corrected on that part.

However, uBO on MV2 still has features that no known native ad blocker on a Chromium-based browser offers.

The closest match I could find is Brave Shields, but it still lags behind on per-site control, mainly because it has no dynamic filtering matrix, and it has no logger comparable to uBO’s. That most of the list i already mentioned multiple times.

To date, nothing matches or beats Firefox + uBO, so the original point still stands. The burden of proof that shows the contrary is on you for that.

I am going to do my best to explain the technical side in simple terms.

Chromium browsers use something called manifest V3.

V3 is a google designed “upgrade” to manifest V2 and it blocks certain advanced features provided by comprehensive adblocker like Ubo.

Wether an adblock is native or an extension does nothing to circumvent the native limitations of V3 that exists on all chromium browsers. If you have proof such hack exists that would actually be a technews worthy event.

The only (mainstream) browser that still supports V2 is firefox. Which is therefor the only browser that allows all the features of the full ublock origin. Firefox has no inbuild adblocker to compare to a chromium one.

I can believe that the features that work on V3 encompass your personal needs and that of many other people. But they are literaly not the same.

Some examples of features included in comprehensive v2 adblockers that are limited on v3 are:

(Not a full list)

• per site dynamic filtering
• per site disabling of javascript
• more detailed logger
• filters relying on runtime logic
• more comprehensive element picker

I (and the Ubo developers) would be happy to see any proof that shows otherwise.

This seems to be a bit of a miscommunication. But an extension is not native. And all versions of Ubo are extensions, something else doesnt exist.

You can define native a few different ways in english language so i get how it might be confusing if its not your first, but its similar to how a mod for a game is not native to the game.

When you mentioned “native adblock in chromium” That does exists and it requires no extension. But they are never as fully featured as the full Ubo extension which only works on firefox. Which is what this comparison is about.

I hope that helps.

Not the person you replied to but copied directly from https://ublockorigin.com/

Lite vs. full uBlock Origin

Choose Lite when…

• You use current Chrome or Safari.
• You want filtering modes with relatively little setup.
• Its browser-supported filters cover the sites you visit.

Choose full uBO when…

• You use Firefox on desktop or Android.
• You need dynamic filtering, the request logger, or advanced per-site controls.
• You rely on filter syntax that Lite cannot support.

At my work all the laptops are touchscreen.

The majority of users dont know this. With a few rare exception those that do know still never use it.

Its was sometimes used by IT for doing certain bulk procedure on multiple laptops at once. This procedure is rarely required anymore since a year ago.

Removed by mod

Thank you for verifying the meaning of your content.

I thought the joke was that the coupon itself was free or that the coupon was ai generated by mobilek.