• Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    2.5 million and I quit my job. 100k/year passive income. I’m learning to cook, probably adopting a child or 2.

  • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    29 minutes ago

    $300,000

    High yield savings account would get you a little over 1k$ a month from interest alone. I already live on less than that. I’d just live off the interest.

  • farmgineer@nord.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve never thought it all out, but 5-10 million USD. It’s probably overkill, but I’m budgeting expense if I need to help my family out in the US as they age and such.

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    $50 mil, just enough to be reckless and still retire. I’d never work again. Vacations 24/7.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Whatever I need for churnin passive income to be comfortable and do some travel til end of life

  • Necrifyre@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    $1 Million.

    Everything I’d be paying now, I’d be good for 15 whole years. By the time those 15 years end, I’d be in my 50s. But I’d have all of the time between now and then to like, develop skills that are of use to me.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Same. I could easily live off the interest as our bills are way lower than typical. Drop $600mo. off when the mortgage is paid in 7-years, then I’m really free.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    10 mil. Enough to absorb all but the worst shocks to the stock market, continue to grow if desired, or pull $500,000/yr interest at a conservative 5% growth. $500,000 year means you could afford the Lamborghini, but you still gotta make payments.

    IMO $2-3 million today is about the “millionaire” of yesteryear, someone we used to call rich but not crazily so. $10 million is actual passive wealth that is enough to live very well without touching the principal.

    • eyesaremosaics@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      If you want it to run indefinitely then you need to let the principle grow with inflation as well, so with 5% growth and 3% CPI you have $200k to spend each year (which will also scale with CPI)

      Edit: you’ll also have to choose more risky investments to stay above CPI, which means the stock market rather than fixed interest, and means your pot of money can change quite a bit with market shifts, and you may need to downsize expenses in some periods or risk eating into your principle if you can’t trim your lifestyle

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yes, I understand that and stated that the amount could be allowed to continue to grow as one of the choices for the investment. There was no need for me to get into the details and make it a financial lesson in respons to a hypothetical fantasy amount of money.

  • PangurBan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    700k and I’d be choosing to be dirt poor in monetary value.

    But I’d have freedom to live. Not lavishly, but I’d be free. Read books. Exercise. Creat art. Love, maybe.

    There are many things in life that are both valuable and nearly costless. That’d be better than what I do now.

  • Professorozone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    OP should probably have asked for the ages of people responding. One million takes an old person beyond the grave but might fall short for a 20 year old.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    1mil but I’d probably still work. I’d wanna be a fulltime BERRT nurse (Behavioral Emergency Rapid Response Team) and just wander around the hospital at night calming patients down. I’ve done a little BERRT work but most hospitals won’t pay a living wage for someone to do that full time. It’s usually just lumped on the psych unit charge so they can only respond when they’re not busy which defeats the point of an emergency response protocol. Doing that full time and just wandering around the hospital giving fake cigarettes to people with Alzheimer’s and talking people withdrawing into sticking it out through their detox protocol would literally be my dream come true LOL.

  • heatermcteets@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    4 million invested with 5% withdrawal rate and 400k in HYSA. 200k per year with 2 years in reserve to buffer any sequence of return risk on the 4M. Adjust spending and rate as needed.

    • CoconutLove@lemmy.todayOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why 5% withdrawal rate? Also, what do you do with your buffer in a year where the market crashes? Skip adding to your reserve that year and hope for a recovery?

      • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        many got burned on that formula before 2008. 45% of the entire value of the stock market is tied up in the magnificent seven of NVidia and AI. all go poof.

      • heatermcteets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s the famous 4% rule that has been amended to 4.7%. I rounded up to 5%. Just a nice even number of 200k per year. With the flexibility the buffer adds and the ability to cut back in a down year I’d be comfortable with the extra .3%.

        The buffer is there to live off of in a down year or years and not pull 5% out of the investment portfolio. Either 100% comes from the buffer or it can supplement a much lower withdrawal rate. In a known downturn I could reduce my expenses, minimize withdrawal rate, and fund the rest of the year with the buffer. Essentially I don’t want to pull $$ out of the 4M on a down year that will prevent recovery.

        In an up year or a year I didn’t spend the full withdrawal amount, I can replenish. The 5% rate over a long time period will still let the portfolio grow. So if I pay myself 200k per year static, my rate could also naturally decline. There are a lot of factors (inflation, expenses, lifestyle) but that’s the high level framework.