Node.js has just released fixes for 10 security vulnerabilities that could put node-powered applications at risk and is urging everyone to update their systems.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I run a la. Not even a full lamp. Its just a slack box with base apache html.

    For years i’ve been mocked. But that bitch has never been compromised and it’s damned near impossible. Who’s laughing now.

  • canttakeitwithyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    The sky is falling… Except it isn’t. Standard nonsense self advertising. And yes, vulnerabilities exist and canleasd to badness. We agree. It has always been so.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      This always struck me as a rather silly idea, to be honest.

      Now we’ve come full circle. I have a vendor who is insisting that I use node.js and pull their code from their NPM repository from the same… For frontend code. Just, have the entire contents of your (their) node_modules folder exposed to the public internet at all times. Isn’t this just Javascript with extra steps?

  • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    While the world reels from websites being taken down before critical PHP patches were released

    Is it just me or did anyone else not even notice outside of articles lol… It was all resolved by the time I got off work.

      • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        An important point yes and I do understand that, but the major players like Steam were updated and done before I knew it. I have no doubt this could come back to bite companies/people lagging behind over the next few years, but the impact to me from websites being taken down was 0, which was my point.

        • Rimu@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The companies with well-resourced dev teams would have been able to deal with it. But for every one of those there’s 50 companies with no dev team who are sending frantic emails to the guy who quit 3 years ago asking if he’s available for some urgent work. And another 50 that are not sending any emails because they’re oblivious and will get pwned in a few months.

          A lot of PHP apps are old, unmaintained or run by people with no idea. That’s kinda it’s niche.

          • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah but this wasn’t an exploit in PHP applications, this was an exploit in PHP.

            Our resolution was to unzip a new directory and change the path to PHP in Apache conf

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah, so here’s the thing. People keep trying to bash on PHP as if anything software isn’t manmade and comes baked with flaws that can be exploited. It’s the single reason why cybersecurity products are never going to stop being used because no matter what, it’s based on something somebody made.

    It’s going to be flawed or be exploitable by some means. Yesterday it was Log4J, now it’s PHP, tomorrow it will be something else. It will never end. Companies deliberately also use this to force you to upgrade because they’ve abandoned “legacy” products that still work but which they no longer choose to maintain because they want more money and need to stifle you for it somehow.

  • tourist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    every time the sun rises, shines and sets; a million new node vulnerabilities are discovered

    be careful, obviously, but don’t let it turn your entire nervous system into pure crystallized cortisol

    you can deal with it on Monday

    • Siru@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Has pure HTML (no css, no javascript) ever had a serious security issue? On the server side obviously not (outside of the apache/nginx/etc. having application bugs), but even on the client side has there ever been an exploit?

  • python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I mean I’ll update my Node version, but until someone actually finds an exploit chain on a real system (instead of a vibecoded PoC) I don’t see any reason to panic. All these "could"s and "would"s in the article suggest that it’s kind of a nothing-burger imo

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ll bet this is another “AI found a known vulnerability so people are making a big deal about it” like the PHP one.

    • aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it’s really a PoC, it would actually execute and therefore exploit something (otherwise it wouldn’t be a proof). In which case it doesn’t matter if it’s vibecoded or not. If you succeed in breaching a system with it, there’s an issue that needs to be fixed.

      • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yup. Once the PoC has been documented, you gotta patch. Now if you want them to stop vibe coding to find complex PoCs that a human may have never found, it’s a risk.