This got removed from politics because “Video links are not allowed” apparently? Pretty weird considering that most politicians say stuff on video nowadays and not really writing articles anymore since the invention of the radio pretty much lol. Hope it’s a better fit here, this is the kind of stuff people should be aware of.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/13118934

Josh Turek of Iowa, Democrat, comes out with one of the worst anti-trans ads yet.

Not only is it an anti-sports ad, it proposes a ban on federal funding for gender affirming care. That would hit all medicaid and medicare patients, and any ACA federally-subsidized plans as well.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or just don’t vote for a fucking conservative. “Vote blue no matter who” is how we got dems like this on the ballot. If the left signals to them that they have our vote no matter what their policies are, then their best strategy for getting elected is to appeal to the right.

      • Manjushri@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, we got dems like this on on the ballot by people not voting in the primaries. If people would get off their asses and participate and vote in the primaries, we could have good candidates. Since it’s too late to change that, though, the only choice now is to vote for the lesser evil. Anything else means letting the greater evil win by default.

        Now is not the time for a moral stand. Now is the time to be pragmatic. Don’t vote for what is effectively a Nazi just because the other candidate isn’t perfect.

        • Cherries@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Maybe you should just accept that this candidate has lost the trans vote and move on instead of demanding trans people and their allies support their demise. It’s not trans people’s fault this candidate is anti-trans. Don’t go after trans folks just because their voting decisions aren’t “perfect”. When a candidate says he is anti-trans, it seems absurd to castigate trans allies for believing him.

          Sure, it’s too late to get a different Dem candidate, but that just makes it more important that the Dem candidate doesn’t make dumbass decisions to needlessly throw away voters for zero benefit. It seems like a bad use of your time to go after the many people in the voter base this candidate is alienating. It would be more efficient to rebuke this single candidate and demand he apologize.

          • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            No no, because that would mean we actually have to take responsibility instead of blaming minorities, and we’re too busy waiting in line for brunch. /s

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          As far as I know, there was no indication that this dude is a massive transphobe prior to the primaries. This needs to lose him votes. I’m not encouraging anyone to vote for what is effectively a nazi, I’m encouraging people to vote for someone who isn’t a transphobe.

          I am so sick and fucking tired of you people acting like we want perfection. I’m not saying not to vote for him because he isn’t perfect, I’m saying not to vote for him because he wants to harm trans people. The DNC supports candidates like this because they appeal to the right, and that’s the only demographic they need to earn votes from. Make them earn your vote.

        • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nah. I’m trans. If the Democrats are going to abandon me and my people, then I think every queer person should just stay home and not vote at all. I will not vote for the promise of “we’ll save democracy but also liquidate trans people.” If you’re not willing to stand up for minorities, then we can all go to hell together.

          • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Are you even from Iowa? Either way, you are screwed. If you don’t see the benefit of voting for the lesser evil, you do you, but all that does is make when you do have to choose the lesser evil be in even more dire circumstances.

            I’d rather choose a ban on federal funds being gaslit as “liquidating trans people”, which is no different to Republican candidate Ashley Hinson’s position, to go through the majority least likely to allow it to go through, Democrats. Meanwhile, a MAGA dominated senate has allowed actual liquidation of trans people from serving in places like the military and other federal agencies.

            • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              A ban of federal funding for gender affirming health care, i.e. denying health care to a marginalised group of people who can’t otherwise access it, is quite literally a genocidal act in a way that a ban on serving in the military doesn’t even come close to.

              • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                It’s actually not, and that’s crazy talk. People still being able to perform gender affirming health care on their own dime is much more ideal than being liquidated from even being part of major aspects of society.

                • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  You mean their own dime that they don’t have, hence qualifying for federal assistance?

                  Buying HRT of the internet and self-medicating without medical supervision (which does have serious risks) is relatively affordable, and the fact that it isn’t outright banned (yet) is something, but without insurance that covers it, medically supervised HRT is out of reach of many, and any kind of surgery is out of reach of the vast majority. Need I remind you that every serious medical association considers these things to be essential health care?

                  The denial of specifically this health care, which is essential to trans people, is a deliberate infliction of living conditions calculated to bring about the destruction of trans people who have no other means, as a group.

                  The US has been gearing up for a trans genocide (per the The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention) for a long time, and you are proving your willingness to be a collaborator in it.

                  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    The Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and Human Security is releasing this third Red Flag Alert for the USA related to the Trump Administration’s anti-trans initiatives

                    “Welp, I guess we better empower the Trump administration more because the alternative has someone who said something nasty!”

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Don’t lie to yourself. What the candidate is advocating for will result in dead Trans people. With 100% certainty. If you are okay with dead Trans people as long as it furthers your aims then be honest at least.

              But telling Trans people they have to vote for someone who wants them to die is simply evil.

              • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                But telling Trans people they have to vote for someone

                Then don’t, and be worse off for it while you fantasize about the ideal solution.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  Some of you may die but that is a sacrifice we are willing to make.

                  • literally you
                  • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    You are the peasant that’s about to get trampled because they never played politics, you do you. One bad Iowa candidate doesn’t make the entire party, that gaslighting is literally on you.